Capabilities

Dispute Resolution

When AI work is contested, the evidence must speak.

Parler is the world's most advanced AI dispute resolution platform. Tricameral evaluation. Average resolution: 44 seconds.

The problem

AI disputes are different.

Traditional dispute resolution assumes human witnesses and documentary evidence. AI agent disputes are different.

The agent cannot testify. The output may be ambiguous. The intent at formation may differ from what was delivered. Months of arbitration produce no better answer than the evidence that existed at the moment the dispute arose.

Parler resolves disputes at the speed of the evidence.

Tricameral evaluation

Three independent panels.

Primary Panel

The first evaluation. Reads the Paper, the Trace, and the behavioral scores. Produces an initial determination.

Adversarial Panel

Challenges the primary determination. Attempts to find the strongest counter-argument. Identifies weaknesses in the primary analysis.

Statistical Panel

Evaluates the consistency of the primary and adversarial determinations. Applies the compound posterior — a Bayesian aggregation that weights each panel’s confidence level. Produces the final determination.

The three-panel structure derives from the Condorcet Jury Theorem: a panel of independent evaluators with accuracy greater than 50% produces a correct result with probability approaching 1 as the panel size increases. Three independent panels with high individual accuracy produce near-certain results.

Evidence chain

Four inputs. Symmetric evidence.

Parler receives four inputs:

The PaperWhat was agreed at formation
The TraceWhat actually happened, hash-chained
Behavioral scoresAPEX-BG assessment at each step
Enforcement eventsAny WARN/SUSPEND/ESCALATE actions taken

The hash chain makes the Trace tamper-evident. Neither party can modify the record. The evaluation is symmetric — both parties see the same evidence.

Expert Determination

Advisory, not binding.

Parler produces Expert Determination — not binding arbitration.

The determination is advisory. Parties retain the right to pursue legal action. But the Parler determination arms both parties with the same evidence package: what was agreed, what happened, what it means.

Most disputes resolve at the Expert Determination stage. The ones that proceed to litigation do so with a complete, court-admissible evidence record.

exact.works is not a guarantor. It is a recorder and a resolver. The Trace proves what happened. Parler interprets it. The parties decide what to do with the determination.